First Response From The National Lottery

Many of you will be aware that on September 9th, People For Economic Justice dispatched a letter to Ireland’s National Lottery, highlighting to them our concerns in regards to their use of KPMG as their independent auditors. Today we received a less than illuminating response from them. You can find the responses below, along with a scanning of each of the actual letters involved. If you haven’t read our original letter to the National Lottery, we suggest you do so before continuing.

The National Lottery’s First Response:

19th September
Mr. Ben Gilroy
People For Economic Justice,
28 Riverview,
Athlumney Abbey,
Navan,
Co. Meath 

Dear Mr Gilroy,

First Response From The National Lottery

First Response From The National Lottery (Warning: Image Quite Large)

Thank you for your recent correspondence in relation to the National Lottery’s independent auditors, KPMG.

The company KPMG were appointed as independent auditors for the National Lottery through a public procurement process. In accordance with public procurement guidelines the invitation to tender for this contract were advertised on etenders.gov.ie. It was open to interested auditing companies in the European Union. KPMG was selected as the most economically advantageous tender of those received. The National Lottery has entered into a contract with KPMG for its services. Our relationships with all of our suppliers are governed by contractual terms. KPMG has consistently met all of their contractual obligations to the National Lottery.

I understand from your letter that you are dissatisfied in your dealings with KPMG and would suggest that you contact KPMG directly to convey your concerns.

Yours sincerely

Declan Harrington
Head of Finance 

It doesn’t take much to notice a few problems with the above response. Firstly (we are by no means disappointed that someone of authority in The National Lottery dealt with the letter) the letter was not address to Declan Harrington, but to Dermot Griffin, the Chief Executive Officer of The National Lottery. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the response above does not address a single concern raised in our original letter. Our response below will hopefully correct these issues, and more.

Our First Reply To The National Lottery

Mr Declan Harrington
Cc: Mr Dermot Griffin
National Lottery,
Abbey Street Lower,
Dublin 1
20th September 2012

Dear Declan,

Our First Reply To The National Lottery

Our First Reply To The National Lottery (Warning: Image Quite Large)

Thank you for your prompt reply. I must say that it was quite a cold corporate response to what was a true human tragic concern of one of the causes of suicide. I was a bit disappointed that Mr Griffin, to whom the letter was addressed, couldn’t take time to reply to the concerns raised by the many people around the country.

Declan, as head of finance, I’m not really sure why the grave concerns of a growing number of discontented people around the country should fall in your remit. While I don’t want to seem ungrateful for a reply I wasn’t asking anything about your finances.

Your letter describes the way on tenders for the position that KPMG now hold. My letter merely complained of who they are and the practices they conduct around the country. The letter states that you have a contract with KPMG and they meet their contractual obligations. The inference is taken that once they do what they are paid to do, it is of no concern to your company what they do or how they act to your customers the length and breadth of the country. I am reminded of the legal maxim “He who contracts, knows, or ought to know, the quality of the person with whom he contracts, otherwise he is not excusable”.

Perhaps in the future your company will choose more wisely, when contract with companies like KPMG, and won’t only consider the most “economically advantageous” company, because in the long run, they may turn out to be the most costly, for all of us. 

Update From The National Lottery?

As of Friday 18th of August 2017 The National Lottery have yet to respond. We will post the update as a new article if and when it arrives.

A Letter We Are Sending To The National Lottery

Ben Gilroy and People For Economic Justice are about to dispatch the following letter to Dermot Griffin, Chief Executive Officer of The National Lottery. The letter is in regards to their use of KPMG as their advisers/accountants.

Mr Dermot Griffin CEO
National Lottery,
Abbey Street Lower,
Dublin 1.
09 September 2012

Dear Sir,

I would like to make it known to you and your organisation of the absolute disgust that people all over the country portray to us in regards to the National Lottery. The source of this comes from your decision to have KPMG as your advisers/accountants. I am not sure if you know but KPMG are one of the most aggressive receivers in this country. There seems to be no reasoning with them and I have personally attended meetings with their agents to try come to some sort of reasonable solution that may be acceptable to the bank. I have always found them aggressive and not tuned in to the desperation of the person whose business is failing. When I asked one of their agents, at a meeting in KPMG head office, about a duty of care to the business owner, his reply was “I don’t give a toss about my duty of care”. I must say I was disgusted with this attitude. (Audio recording of meeting available). KPMG are moving in on farms and businesses all over the country.

With banking fraud, greed and deception rife, and the eventual forcing of the good people of this State, to bail out the very banks and bankers, who now show no remorse or their agents KPMG showing even less. It galls the Irish people to see them now involved with the Lotto, which is largely recognised as doing good work.

The Samaritans organization has told the papers that help-lines are under pressure with the massive volume of calls. They take one call every five seconds; every 57 seconds someone calls the Samaritans with suicidal feelings. The majority of callers are men in their 30s as the recession deepens. Ireland’s suicide rate now stands at a shocking 600 deaths per year – and experts believe the figure is rising as the country experiences the pain of recession. A well-orchestrated recession I might add.

The National Suicide Research Foundation’s Director Paul Corcoran said: “The findings are not a coincidence. There is clear evidence that the recession has impacted on the rate of suicidal behaviour in Ireland.
I now ask you on behalf of People for Economic Justice to terminate all contact with these vultures who hover over the carcasses of dying businesses that their employers helped to poison and kill, while KPMG seem intent on finishing off the owners.

Awaiting your reply

Ben Gilroy

Update From The National Lottery?

The National Lottery responded on September 20th. Please find the response and our subsequent reply, here.

Lee Harrington (Golf Pro) Evicted in Error

We strive here at People For Economic Justice to show in an honest light, the blatantly unlawful actions often undertaken by the banking sector. The actions occur during the repossession of homes and businesses from people who are unable to keep up with their mortgage repayments. These people would like nothing more than to keep paying, but are simply unable to do so at the rate that they managed during the economic boom. The following video from TNS Radio, shows just how above and beyond the law these institutions believe themselves to be, in a situation involving popular professional golfer Lee Harrington.

Lee Harrington’s Home

And there you have it. Golfer Lee Harrington returned home one day to find himself evicted from his home. Lee was disconcerted to find his normal key not working, but also the electricity and water having been cut off. The odd part about this issue, which from the outside appeared to be a cut and dry eviction, is that Lee Harrington did not owe a single cent to any bank for this home, having made a very healthy living as caddy to Tiger Woods, and having won the Irish Open himself. Lee is currently in contact with his solicitor to deal with the matter.

This says a great deal about how the banks view themselves. They are so unconcerned about the law that they don’t even feel the need to double-check the address they gave to the Sheriff, when they dispatch him to tear families from their homes on a day-to-day basis. This Sheriff then clearly does not feel the need to double-check that the house in question was even purchased using a loan from that bank. They could in theory just hand out any old address, and have the Sheriff sell it! Not only do they break the constitution, wherein Lee Harrington’s home is stated to be inviolable save as to law, but even if that law did not exist, they are breaking and entering as Lee Harrington did not even have a loan arranged with them to start with.